Approximate read time: 50 minutes

The Bus Services (No 2) Bill contains measures to make it easier and faster for local transport authorities to franchise bus services in their area. The Bus Services Act 2017 allowed local authorities to adopt a franchising model, whereby the authority determines the network of services and private sector operators provide them under contract. Only mayoral combined authorities and mayoral combined county authorities currently have the power to do this without first obtaining the secretary of state’s consent; the bill would remove this requirement for all local transport authorities. The 2017 act enabled local transport authorities that did not establish franchising schemes to set up enhanced partnerships with operators instead. The bill seeks to safeguard “socially necessary” services within enhanced partnership models by requiring local transport authorities in these areas to identify such services and specify arrangements that must be followed if a bus operator wants to cancel or vary them. The bill would also enable another model for the provision of local bus services by repealing the ban introduced by the 2017 act on local authorities creating their own municipal bus companies.  

The bill also contains measures intended to improve the transparency and accessibility of data about local bus services and operator performance; to give local transport authorities greater enforcement powers to tackle fare evasion and anti-social behaviour; to improve the safety and accessibility of bus stops and bus stations for disabled people; to mandate enhanced criminal records checks for drivers on school services; to mandate regular training for bus drivers and other staff on disability and tackling crime and anti-social behaviour; and to restrict the use of new non-zero emission buses on registered local bus services at some point after 1 January 2030.  

The government said in a press released on the day the bill was introduced that it would  improve buses and boost local control of services”, as well as “put buses back at the heart of communities”.  

The bill has been welcomed by the bus sector, local authorities and passenger representatives. However, there have been calls for more long-term funding to support the delivery of better bus services and ensure the bill achieves its aims. Passenger groups emphasised the need for passengers to be at the heart of implementing the reforms. 


Related posts

  • Biodiversity loss and climate change: Interdependent global challenges

    Nature and climate change are considered to be inextricably linked. Climate change is one of the drivers of biodiversity loss, along with factors including unsustainable food production and the overuse of natural resources. Nature is considered a key tool in combating rising global temperatures, for example forests and peatlands can play an important role in absorbing carbon emissions. This briefing summarises biodiversity loss, nature-based solutions to climate change and UK climate and nature policy.

    Biodiversity loss and climate change: Interdependent global challenges
  • Long-duration energy storage: House of Lords Committee report and plans for a new scheme

    Renewable energy generation can depend on factors like weather conditions and daylight hours. Long-duration energy storage technologies store excess power for long periods to even out the supply. In March 2024, the House of Lords Science and Technology Committee said increasing the UK’s long-duration energy storage capacity would support the UK’s net zero plans and energy security. The government has announced an investment support scheme, to launch in 2025.

    Long-duration energy storage: House of Lords Committee report and plans for a new scheme
  • Sentences of imprisonment for public protection: HM Prison and Probation Service annual report

    Imprisonment for public protection (IPP) sentences were indeterminate sentences given to serious offenders who posed a significant risk of serious harm to the public. Although it is over a decade since they were abolished, more than 2,000 people are still in prison serving an IPP sentence. The Labour government has said it would not conduct a resentencing exercise but has said it would continue its efforts in supporting those in custody to reduce their risk and move towards a safe and sustainable release.

    Sentences of imprisonment for public protection: HM Prison and Probation Service annual report