Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Bill: HL Bill 53 of 2024–25

Approximate read time: 45 minutes

The Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Bill was introduced in the House of Lords on 10 December 2024. It is scheduled to receive its second reading on 7 January 2025. The bill would introduce requirements on those responsible for certain publicly accessible premises and events to implement measures in the event of a terrorist attack, for example evacuation plans. Additionally, it would also require certain larger premises and events to take steps to reduce their vulnerability to terrorist attacks. The bill would establish a tiered approach linked to the activity that takes place at premises or events and the number of people it would be reasonable to expect to attend. It would also establish the Security Industry Authority (SIA) as the regulator and give it enforcement powers. 

The government has argued that the legislation is necessary due to the changing threat posed by terrorism, with attacks in recent years showing that the public can be targeted in a wide range of venues and spaces. It has also highlighted that the UK’s approach to protective security has been voluntary to date, with research showing that counter-terrorism security efforts are often prioritised behind legally required activities such as health and safety. Other stakeholders have called for the legislation since 2017, including the Martyn’s law campaign and coroners at inquests into recent terrorist attacks. 

Prior to the 2024 general election, former Conservative governments had explored options in this area, including running public consultations and publishing draft legislation. However, the House of Commons Home Affairs Committee criticised a draft bill when carrying out pre-legislative scrutiny in 2023. The new Labour government published the current version of the bill in September 2024. It has several key differences from the original draft bill which have been welcomed by stakeholders.

The bill has completed its passage through the House of Commons where it received cross-party support. Minor and technical government amendments were made to the bill at both committee and report stage, all which were agreed to without a vote. Oppostion amendments, none of which were successful, included a focus on the thresholds set for certain duties, the provision of training and regulation making powers.