The Economic Activity of Public Bodies (Overseas Matters) Bill is a government bill that aims to prevent public authorities participating in boycott, divestment and sanctions campaigns. This is set out in clause 1 of the bill, which would prohibit public authorities from boycotting goods from, or disinvesting from, states or territories if to do so could be construed as being based on moral or political disapproval. The bill would also ban public authorities from stating that they intended to contravene clause 1, or from saying they would have contravened it had the law not been in place. 

There are provisions in the bill that would allow the government to make regulations specifying countries to which the measures would not apply. The government has said it intends to use this power to exempt Russia and Belarus from the ban, meaning public authorities could boycott or disinvest from these countries. A controversial clause in the bill states that Israel, the Occupied Palestinian Territories and the Occupied Golan Heights could not be exempted by regulations; for these territories to be exempted would require primary legislation. These are the only territories named specifically in the bill. 

The government has stated that the bill is particularly intended to stop public authorities from supporting, or being pressured into supporting, the boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) campaign that specifically targets Israel. It argues the BDS movement undermines community cohesion. During the bill’s passage through the House of Commons, most members participating in the debates expressed disapproval of the BDS campaign. However, the Labour Party, SNP and Liberal Democrats opposed the bill. Grounds for this opposition included that it would stop public authorities from expressing disapproval of states committing human rights abuses, and that it would contravene international law by conflating Israel with the Occupied Palestinian Territories and the Occupied Golan Heights. 

The bill passed its Commons stages unamended.


Related posts

  • UK-Mauritius treaty on the Chagos Archipelago

    The Chagos Archipelago has been the subject of a long-standing dispute over its sovereignty between the UK and Mauritius. Having been retained by the UK since 1965, the largest island, Diego Garcia, later became the site of a joint UK-US military base. In May 2025, the UK reached an agreement to transfer sovereignty of the islands back to Mauritius, while maintaining an initial 99-year lease of Diego Garcia. The agreement also includes security and financial provisions.

    UK-Mauritius treaty on the Chagos Archipelago
  • Wildfires: Reducing the risks and mitigating the effects

    Wildfires can harm people and ecosystems and damage property and the environment. Almost all wildfires in the UK are the result of accidental or deliberate acts by humans. Their frequency and severity have been increasing in recent years, with the area burned so far in 2025 already setting records. The National Fire Chiefs Council has called for more resourcing, consistency and coordination to mitigate the effects of future wildfires.

    Wildfires: Reducing the risks and mitigating the effects
  • A new national policy statement for nuclear energy generation

    National policy statements (NPSs) inform decision-making for nationally significant infrastructure projects. The current NPS for nuclear power generation (EN-6) has effect for listed nuclear projects capable of being deployed by the end of 2025. Both the current and previous governments have consulted on a new NPS (EN-7) that would apply to nuclear power stations expected to be deployed after 2025. This briefing gives an overview of NPSs, the proposed new NPS for nuclear power generation and the reaction to it, as well as the current government’s policy on nuclear energy.

    A new national policy statement for nuclear energy generation