The government is asking Parliament to pass the Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill to confirm Rwanda as a safe country in UK domestic law. This would enable the removal of individuals entering the UK without permission under the terms of legislation previously passed by Parliament. It would also advance the government’s ‘Rwanda policy’, following a Supreme Court judgment that the policy was unlawful based on a risk that those removed to Rwanda under a UK-Rwanda asylum partnership could be returned to countries where they may face persecution or other inhumane treatment. This is known as ‘refoulement’. 

The bill accompanies a new treaty signed by the UK and Rwanda to strengthen safeguards in an earlier asylum partnership agreement. The treaty has been laid before Parliament and is awaiting ratification. On 22 January 2024, the House approved a resolution tabled by Lord Goldsmith (Labour), chair of the House of Lords International Agreements Committee, that the government should not ratify the treaty “until the protections it provides have been fully implemented, since Parliament is being asked to make a judgement, based on the agreement, about whether Rwanda is safe”. After debate, the House approved the resolution by 214 votes to 171. The government can override this if it lays a statement before Parliament. 

The House of Commons has passed the bill, although its provisions have been politically controversial. The Labour Party has called the government’s Rwanda policy unaffordable, unworkable and unlawful. A number of Conservative backbenchers have argued the bill’s provisions are not robust enough to implement the government’s removal policy as intended. In addition, a number of legal scholars have said the bill is not compatible with international law. Others disagree, however, arguing the bill as drafted could effect the government’s policy as intended while remaining compatible with international law.

The government has published explanatory notes, a human rights memorandum and a number of other documents to accompany the bill.


Related posts

  • Modern Slavery Act 2015: Lords committee post-legislative scrutiny

    In October 2024, a House of Lords committee published a post-legislative review of the Modern Slavery Act 2015. The committee argued that the legislation was no longer world-leading. It suggested developments worldwide had led to the UK falling behind internationally and that recent immigration legislation had limited the act’s support infrastructure for victims. It called on government policy to recognise the difference between migrants coming to the UK willingly and victims of trafficking.

    Modern Slavery Act 2015: Lords committee post-legislative scrutiny
  • 75th anniversary of the European Convention on Human Rights

    The European Convention on Human Rights was signed by the members of the Council of Europe, including the UK, in Rome in 1950. The UK was one of the first states to ratify it in 1951 and it is now incorporated into UK law through the Human Rights Act 1998. The UK government has recently restated its unequivocal commitment to the convention.

    75th anniversary of the European Convention on Human Rights
  • Reducing the crown court backlog

    The crown court backlog reached a record high of 73,105 cases in September 2024. The impact on victims, witnesses and defendants has been significant as they wait longer for their cases to be resolved. The government commissioned an independent review of criminal courts that will produce reform recommendations to address crown court pressures. Whilst stakeholders have welcomed the review, some have called for more immediate action to reduce the backlog.

    Reducing the crown court backlog