Documents to download

This Briefing has been prepared in advance of the debate in the House of Lords on the motion moved by Lord De Mauley (Conservative) that “this House takes note of the contribution of the armed forces reserves to national security”. This debate is scheduled to take place on 21 June 2018, prior to Reserves Day which takes place on 27 June 2018.

Over recent decades, the role of the armed forces reserves has changed. While the reserves have retained their role providing support to regular personnel, since the end of the Cold War the size of reserve forces has reduced. The reserve forces have also taken part in a number of post-Cold War conflicts such as in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere. This is in addition to providing support following natural disasters in the UK, such as during the flooding in Cumbria in 2009 and 2015 and in Somerset in 2014.

The Coalition Government and subsequent Conservative governments, under both David Cameron and Theresa May, have sought to increase the size and role of the armed forces reserves. Both these governments have maintained that greater use of reserves offers the opportunity to import skills from outside the military and that reservists could supplement the work of regular personnel so that their specialist military expertise can be used more cost-effectively.

However, this expansion has proved controversial as it has taken place at the same time as a reduction to the number of regular personnel following the 2010 Strategic Defence and Security Review. MPs and Members of the House of Lords have criticised the expansion of the reserves at the same time as the reduction in the number of regular personnel, arguing that it could damage the overall effectiveness of the UK armed forces because of difficulties in recruiting and retaining reservists and maintained their readiness.


Documents to download

Related posts

  • UK-Ukraine 100-year partnership agreement: House of Lords International Agreements Committee report

    The UK signed a 100-year partnership agreement with Ukraine in January 2025, setting out commitments to cooperate on defence and security, as well as in other policy fields. The House of Lords International Agreements Committee supported the rationale behind the agreement, but said it lacked detail and a plan for implementation. It recommended the agreement should be reviewed in the event Russia and Ukraine reach a peace settlement.

    UK-Ukraine 100-year partnership agreement: House of Lords International Agreements Committee report
  • Ottawa Treaty and the Convention on Cluster Munitions: Recent developments

    The Baltic States and Poland recently announced their withdrawal from the Ottawa Treaty, which bans anti-personnel mines. Lithuania has also withdrawn from the Convention on Cluster Munitions, of which those other states are not signatories. The countries have linked their decisions to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the potential for future risks to their territorial integrity. Russia has used both anti-personnel landmines and cluster munitions in its invasion of Ukraine.

    Ottawa Treaty and the Convention on Cluster Munitions: Recent developments
  • Recent US and UK government policy on Ukraine

    The US government has recently shifted its approach to Ukraine, engaging in direct negotiations with Russia regarding the conflict’s resolution, pursuing a minerals agreement with Ukraine, and temporarily halting military aid and intelligence sharing. During these developments, the UK government has reaffirmed its support for Ukraine through financial and military assistance, in addition to hosting a peace summit and committing further military aid.

    Recent US and UK government policy on Ukraine