Documents to download

The House of Lords Social Mobility Committee’s report considered the degree to which there was the potential for movement from one social class to another by young people during the transition from school into work. The Committee concluded that, for the majority of young people who left academic education after their GCSEs to enter work, there were significant barriers to social mobility. This, the Committee argued, was because the transition into work was often confusing and was badly organised by the Government, education providers and employers. For example, young people found themselves missing out on opportunities for entering skilled employment because they did not know what skills were needed by local employers.

The Committee made a number of recommendations, including that the Government change the way education is structured, creating a new ‘transition period’ starting at age 14 and continuing until 18 or 19. The Committee proposed that this stage should have its own core curriculum, with tailor-made academic and vocational courses available. Young people would be guided during this period to make decisions that would impact their future career options. They would also be provided with greater support by schools, working with employers, to develop the skills needed in their local economy.

In its response to the Committee’s report, the Government rejected the proposal to create a new extended transition stage. Instead, it argued that it was already taking steps to improve social mobility through its reforms to the curriculum, changes to technical education and by increasing the number of apprenticeships available. The Government’s response was subsequently criticised by members of the Committee during a debate in the House of Lords in December 2016, including by the chair, Baroness Corston (Labour), who said that the Committee’s conclusions had not been fully addressed.

Subsequently, the Government has made a number of further policy announcements related to the issues considered by the Committee, including technical education, apprenticeships and careers education and support. These were summarised in January 2018, by the then Secretary of State for Education, Justine Greening, who published an update on the Government’s response to the Social Mobility Committee’s report, following the request of the Senior Deputy Speaker and chairman of the House of Lords Liaison Committee, Lord McFall of Alcluith.


Documents to download

Related posts

  • Ready to learn: Increasing the number of five-year-olds with a good level of development

    In its 2024 general election manifesto the Labour Party identified young children not being ready to start school as a barrier to achievement. It stated that “too many children arrive at primary school not ready to learn”. In December 2024 the prime minister said increasing the number of children who start school at a good level of development was one of his government’s six milestones for the current parliament. This briefing looks at what defines school readiness, how many children meet the standard and how the government has said it will make improvements.

    Ready to learn: Increasing the number of five-year-olds with a good level of development
  • US tariffs: Background, perspectives and impact on the UK

    The US has announced significant increases in tariffs on imports, although has delayed full implementation. Many economists view tariffs unfavourably, arguing that they raise prices, reduce competition and risk retaliation. But others suggest that tariffs may benefit the country that applies them. UK exports to the US face an additional 10% tariff. This could be negative for UK exports and the economy. But there could be some upsides for the UK if the US goes ahead with higher “reciprocal” tariffs on many of the UK’s competitors.

    US tariffs: Background, perspectives and impact on the UK
  • Tobacco and Vapes Bill: HL Bill 89 of 2024–25

    The bill aims to create a 'smoke-free generation' by banning tobacco sales to anyone born on or after 1 January 2009, alongside other measures to tackle smoking and tobacco harms. It would also further regulate vaping, curbing its appeal to children, while enabling adult smokers to use vapes as a quitting tool. The bill is similar to the Tobacco and Vapes Bill which fell at dissolution 2024.

    Tobacco and Vapes Bill: HL Bill 89 of 2024–25