Documents to download

Following the result of the referendum on leaving the European Union in June 2016, there has been much discussion as to how the outcome will impact on a variety of sectors. One area of discussion has been the potential impact it could have on professional sport. This briefing summarises some of the commentary focusing on this area, and on how professional sport could be affected by the upcoming negotiations on the UK’s future relationship with the EU. It is split into two sections, the potential effect on immigration and free movement and the possible economic impact on the sports sector.

Following the announcement in the 2017 Government white paper that post-Brexit, the Free Movement Directive would no longer apply and the migration of EU nationals would become subject to UK law, commentators have discussed the potential impact this could have on professional sport. This briefing focuses on three of the UK’s most popular team sports—football, rugby and cricket—and explores the possible consequences should European Union and European Economic Area citizens become subject to the same rules which currently apply to individuals from outside of the EU and EEA. Speculation on this scenario has lead commentators to predict that top flight British football could lose a significant number of players—research by the BBC has shown that in the English Premier League, the Championship, and in the Scottish Premier League, 332 players would not meet the current requirements which non-EU and EEA players must meet. In addition, commentators have argued that the loss of exemptions connected to the UK’s membership of the EU would make football more reliant on home-grown talent. It has also been suggested this issue could also extend to both rugby and cricket, with the loss of the ‘Kolpak rule’ meaning that players from countries which have an associate trade agreement with the EU will no longer have the same rights as UK players. However, commentators have claimed that these issues could lead to a greater focus on the development of grassroots sport, which could be positive for the performance of national teams.

There have also been suggestions that the UK’s exit from the EU may have an economic impact on professional sport. Sport and sport-related activity contributes significantly to the economy, with research from 2010 showing it generated £20.3 billion of Gross Value Added (GVA) and 400,000 full-time equivalent jobs. With commentators discussing the impact of the fall in the value of sterling, there have been suggestions that wages and transfer fees will increase. In addition, the potential impact on broadcasting, sponsorship and merchandise sales has been discussed, with some claiming that the issues around immigration could decrease the Premier League’s global appeal and therefore some of its value. However, others have suggested that top flight sport is big enough to weather any issues which could result from the UK leaving the Europe.

Documents to download

Related posts

  • International Women’s Day 2024: Economic inclusion of women

    Economic disparities persist between men and women globally, with women generally facing lower pay, higher levels of informal employment, and more unpaid care work than men. Internationally, the UK government has made commitments to promote gender equality and economic inclusion, but concerns have been raised about the level of aid funding. In the UK, the government has expanded childcare places for working parents and supported private members’ bills to make changes to employment law.

    International Women’s Day 2024: Economic inclusion of women
  • Higher education: Contribution to the economy and levelling up

    The economic output of the UK higher education sector is estimated to be at least £116bn and graduates often experience better employment outcomes than non-graduates. Improving skills features in the government’s levelling up strategy and ministers have said that higher education institutions play a vital part in supporting regional economies. However, some stakeholders have criticised the government’s plans to restrict access to certain higher education courses and for not putting enough emphasis on the benefits provided by the sector.

    Higher education: Contribution to the economy and levelling up