Documents to download

There are a number of communities on islands off the coast of England, particularly on the Isle of Wight (IoW) and Isles of Scilly (IoS), who currently only have transport links to the mainland via ferries and/or aircraft. Using these ferry or aircraft services to and from English islands would require greater travel time and expense than the equivalent distance travelled by road. There are currently no formal island ‘frameworks’ or schemes for English islands agreed at government-level, which provide for transport subsidies or extra funding due to any remoteness created by this additional time and expense.

The absence of such schemes has been raised on a number of occasions in Parliament, often with comparisons made to schemes that support communities in Scottish islands. For example, Andrew Turner, Conservative MP for the IoW from 2001–17, argued in the House of Commons in 2014 that:

The Barnett formula gives the Scottish Parliament money to spend on many things that this Government cannot afford. CalMac provides ferry services to Scottish islands. It received a grant of £73 million last year—more than half its revenue. My constituents living on the island receive no such benefits. They pay the full operating costs and profits, and the fares that they pay also have to service the company’s massive debts. Through their taxes, they subsidise Scottish ferries.

In 2012, Lord Berkeley asked the Government “what action they are taking to create a lifeline passenger ferry link to the Isles of Scilly in line with the Scottish Government’s ferries policy”, arguing that the IoS ferry “only runs for seven months every year and the return fare is £90. This compares with Islay in Scotland where there are several ferries a day all the year round and the return fare is £12.50”.

The Coalition Government stated on a number of occasions that it did not believe additional support was needed for either the IoW or the IoS. In 2013, then Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Transport Stephen Hammond, stated:

This is a competitive market, and it is for the ferry operators to decide the level of fares and services based on market conditions. […] There are more than 200 sailings to and from the island each day, so there is no apparent market failure.       

In 2012, then Lords Spokesperson for the Department for Transport, Earl Attlee, noted on the ‘lifeline’ issue for IoS ferries that he was “aware that passenger transport services to and from the mainland are regarded by residents of the Isles of Scilly as a lifeline”, yet he also said that “ferry services, unlike most of those to the Scottish Islands, are able to operate commercially without subsidy and have done so for many years”.

In 2014, an Islands Framework was agreed between the UK Government and the councils of the Western Isles/Na h-Eileanan Siar, Orkney Islands and Shetland Islands, in response to the ‘Our Islands, Our Future’ campaign led by those three councils. The Framework “recognises the island groups face particular challenges”, including that of transport. In 2012, the Scottish Government published its Ferries Plan for Scottish ferry services from 2013–22. Under the plan, the Scottish Government has made a commitment that it is willing to take over the operation of any ‘lifeline’ ferry service. In addition, it made a commitment to roll-out a Road Equivalent Tariff (RET) scheme across the network as the basis for single fares, for lifeline ferry services only. Under the RET, the Scottish Government stated that “ferry users will pay the same rate per mile, regardless of where they are travelling from and to by ferry”.


Documents to download

Related posts

  • Water (Special Measures) Bill [HL]: HL Bill 17 of 2024–25

    The Water (Special Measures) Bill [HL] is a government bill that would give regulators new powers to regulate the way private water companies operate in England and Wales. This includes the introduction of new penalties for water companies and the power to block executive bonuses. The bill would also make changes to the special administration regime for water companies to ensure the government and regulators were notified ahead of any winding up petitions.

    Water (Special Measures) Bill [HL]: HL Bill 17 of 2024–25
  • Passenger Railway Services (Public Ownership) Bill: HL Bill 21 of 2024–25

    Bringing passenger railway services into public ownership was a commitment in the Labour Party’s manifesto ahead of the 2024 general election. The Passenger Railway Services (Public Ownership) Bill would implement this policy. It would remove the existing presumption that passenger railway service contracts are awarded to private companies. Instead, it would require the government to award contracts to publicly owned companies when existing ones expire.

    Passenger Railway Services (Public Ownership) Bill: HL Bill 21 of 2024–25
  • Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [HL]: HL Bill 18 of 2024–25

    The Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [HL] contains measures seeking to update the UK’s product safety, regulation and metrology framework. The government says the bill aims to ensure the UK is better placed to address modern day safety issues, respond to opportunities that deliver economic growth and to deliver a level playing field for businesses operating online or on the high street.

    Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [HL]: HL Bill 18 of 2024–25