Documents to download

In relation to peace and security, many commentators have speculated as to the impact that leaving the EU could have on the future of peace and security in Northern Ireland. For some, the implications include a danger of the peace process unravelling, the cessation of cross-border peace programmes and a return to the ‘hard’ border that featured so prominently during the Troubles. This includes former Deputy First Minister of Northern Ireland, Martin McGuinness, who has warned that leaving the European Union could “undermine all-Ireland bodies and co-operation created by the peace process and it will harden partition. It will have consequences for human rights legislation which, again, is specifically referred to in the Belfast and subsequent agreements”. In addition, during the passage of the European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Bill in both Houses, concerns were raised regarding the impact that leaving the EU would have on the peace process. This included a number of amendments that sought to take account of the Good Friday Agreement when triggering Article 50 and ensuring that borders between the UK and Ireland remained open once the UK formally withdraws from the EU. In contrast, others have suggested that there will be little or no impact on the peace process, such as the UK Prime Minister, Theresa May, and former First Minister of Northern Ireland, Arlene Foster, who have both stated on multiple occasions that they did not want to see a “return to the border of the past”, reminiscent of the border arrangements during the Troubles.

In terms of trade, should the UK withdraw from the EU, it could possibly impact on bilateral trade relations between the UK and Ireland. As of 2015, the value of trade in exports to Ireland from the UK was £15.1 billion, whilst the value of trade in imports from Ireland to the UK was £11.2 billion. The Economic and Social Research Institute think tank “suggest that a Brexit is likely to significantly reduce bilateral trade flows between Ireland and the UK” and that “the impact could be 20 percent or more”. Others, such as Arlene Foster, have argued against the UK staying in the EU for the sake of existing trade agreements. Writing an article for the Guardian, Foster contended that “there is no evidence to support the case that either Scotland or Northern Ireland should stay in the EU ‘for the sake of’ trade with the rest of the EU”.


Documents to download

Related posts

  • UK-Mauritius treaty on the Chagos Archipelago

    The Chagos Archipelago has been the subject of a long-standing dispute over its sovereignty between the UK and Mauritius. Having been retained by the UK since 1965, the largest island, Diego Garcia, later became the site of a joint UK-US military base. In May 2025, the UK reached an agreement to transfer sovereignty of the islands back to Mauritius, while maintaining an initial 99-year lease of Diego Garcia. The agreement also includes security and financial provisions.

    UK-Mauritius treaty on the Chagos Archipelago
  • End of the second world war: 80th anniversary

    2025 marks the 80th anniversary of Victory in Europe Day and Victory over Japan Day, events which in 1945 brought an end to the second world war. On those days 80 years ago, celebrations erupted across Britain. However, world leaders and domestic politicians were aware of the numerous problems still to be tackled, such as reconstruction, demobilisation and the legacy of the development and use of the atomic bomb.

    End of the second world war: 80th anniversary
  • Compensation for victims of Libyan-sponsored IRA terrorism

    Between the 1970s and 1990s, the Gaddafi-led Libyan regime supplied the Provisional IRA with weapons, finance and military training. This included shipments of the explosive Semtex, which was used in several bombings where a number of people died and many more were injured. Campaigners have called on the UK government to use Libyan assets frozen in 2011 to compensate victims. However, successive governments, including the current Labour government, have declined to do so, arguing it would break international law.

    Compensation for victims of Libyan-sponsored IRA terrorism