Documents to download

The European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom) was established alongside the European Economic Community (EEC) in the 1950s. The UK became a member of both on 1 January 1973. Euratom is a distinct legal entity from the European Union, but the two bodies have a shared institutional framework.

Euratom was founded to contribute to the formation and development of Europe’s nuclear industries, to guarantee high safety standards and to prevent nuclear materials intended principally for civilian use from being diverted to military use. It provides the basis for the regulation of civilian nuclear activity, implements a system of safeguards to control the use of nuclear materials, controls the supply of fissile materials within EU member states and funds research into nuclear fission and nuclear fusion. Euratom has signed a number of international agreements with third countries on nuclear research (both fission and fusion), the peaceful use of nuclear energy and nuclear safety.

The Government introduced the European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Bill in the House of Commons on 26 January 2017. The Bill would give the Prime Minister power to notify the European Council of the UK’s intention to withdraw from the European Union, under the procedure set out in Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union. The Explanatory Notes prepared by the Department for Exiting the European Union state that the Bill also would also provide for the UK to leave Euratom, although Euratom is not mentioned in the Bill itself. The Government’s position is that the way in which Euratom and the EU are uniquely legally joined means that triggering Article 50 also entails giving notice to leave Euratom. This is disputed by some lawyers, who argue that the nexus between the Treaty on European Union and the Euratom Treaty creates a parallel but separate process for leaving Euratom.

An amendment that would have preserved the UK’s membership of Euratom was defeated at the Bill’s committee stage in the House of Commons. Similar amendments have been tabled for the committee stage in the House of Lords which is scheduled to take place on 27 February and 1 March 2017.


Documents to download

Related posts

  • House of Lords Science and Technology Committee report: Impact of noise and light pollution on human health

    In July 2023 the House of Lords Science and Technology Committee published a report into the impact of noise and light pollution on human health. It found that while there is some evidence that both noise and light pollution are harmful to humans, there are significant gaps in research and understanding. This briefing looks at the definitions of noise and light pollution, current legislation and guidelines, and the committee’s report and subsequent government response.

    House of Lords Science and Technology Committee report: Impact of noise and light pollution on human health
  • Border controls for UK and EU imports and exports

    In August 2023, the UK government published its ‘border target operating model’ (BTOM), which set out how the UK would gradually introduce full border controls on imports into Great Britain from the EU. The BTOM is being introduced gradually during 2024. The second phase is scheduled to commence on 30 April 2024 and is set to include the introduction of full sanitary and phytosanitary checks on certain goods imported from the EU. This briefing looks at the controls being introduced on 30 April 2024, as well as concerns raised by industries about how the changes could impact EU imports.

    Border controls for UK and EU imports and exports
  • UN standards on the use of surveillance technology at protests

    The UN recently published a toolkit for law enforcement officials to promote and protect human rights in the context of peaceful protests. It includes key principles for the use of digital technologies in relation to protests. This comes at a time when there are debates around the use of live facial recognition technology in public spaces by police in England and Wales. The government supports developing it as a crime-fighting tool, but others are concerned about its impact on privacy and other rights.

    UN standards on the use of surveillance technology at protests