This Lords Library briefing provides information on fragile states and the effects of conflict, including information on widows.
Fragile States: Effects of Conflict (276 KB , PDF)
Ahead of the debate on 15 September 2016 on the effect of conflict in fragile states on the rate of human rights abuses and the number of widows, this Library briefing details some of the ways in which the fragility of states has been identified, and provides data on the impact of conflicts and the number of widow. It also provides information on the UK Government’s aid policy.
Identifying Fragile States
The term ‘fragile state’ is used in conflict prevention and international development to describe the degree to which countries are at risk of violent conflict and other forms of societal breakdown. There is no internationally agreed single benchmark by which states might be classified as fragile. Fragility is a relative term and the specific circumstance of each state will be different. This briefing summarises some of the inherent difficulties involved in collecting reliable information on areas where there is conflict and tight control of freedom of speech.
The Fund for Peace, the OECD and the World Bank quantify the comparative level of fragility in particular states. This data can be used to identify countries which are most affected by human rights abuse, large scale poverty and other factors contributing to the fragility of a state. Both the Fund for Peace and the OECD use this information to group states according to different metrics for fragility.
Human Rights Abuses in Fragile States
The Fund for Peace, the OECD and the World Bank quantify the comparative level of fragility in particular states. This data can be used to identify countries which are most affected by human rights abuse, large scale poverty and other factors contributing to the fragility of a state. Both the Fund for Peace and the OECD use this information to group states according to different metrics for fragility. This briefing includes analyses of the human rights situation in these fragile countries, including that provided by the Foreign and Commonwealth Office in its 2015 Human Rights and Democracy report.
Quantitative data is provided for fragile states regarding the number of battle-related deaths and the number of widows. Although data from conflict zones is often incomplete, the World Bank has noted large increases in conflict-related deaths in some fragile states over the period 2010–14, including in Syria and Yemen. In the most fragile countries, a median average of 6.25 percent of the women at marriage age were identified as being widows. The Loomba Foundation notes that the data on widows in fragile states often provides an underestimate of the number of widows, so the proportion may in fact be significantly higher.
UK Government Policy
State fragility has been described by the UK Government as having an important impact on the ability of foreign countries and international organisations to provide development aid. This briefing also outlines Government policy regarding development aid targeted towards fragile states.
Fragile States: Effects of Conflict (276 KB , PDF)
The government recently announced an independent review of physician and anaesthesia associates to be led by Professor Gillian Leng. This announcement followed a debate about the use of the roles in the NHS and concerns raised by some stakeholders about patient safety. The review has been widely welcomed by stakeholders as a way to move the debate forward.
The idea of civil service impartiality, defined as the ability to serve the government of the day without fear or favour, is one of the core values promoted by the civil service code. Several recent events have led to debate on whether the civil service has become more politicised and the extent to which that is desirable. This briefing examines that history, and the arguments for and against a more politicised civil service, ahead of a forthcoming debate in the House of Lords.
In the autumn budget the chancellor announced changes to inheritance tax reliefs. From April 2026, taxes would apply to agricultural assets over £1mn (or up to £3mn in certain circumstances). The government has said this will just affect the wealthiest landowners and disincentivise buying agricultural land to avoid tax. Farming groups have argued the policy is a threat to the future of family farming.
