This Lords Library briefing provides information on ministerial collective responsibility in the light of the 2016 EU referendum.
Ministerial Collective Responsibility and Agreement to Differ: Recent Developments (163 KB , PDF)
This House of Lords Library briefing provides background information on collective responsibility in government and recent developments. It also compares the agreements to differ in place for the 2016 EU referendum and during the 1975 referendum on the UK’s membership of the EEC.
Collective Responsibility
The principle of collective responsibility is set out in both the Ministerial Code and the Cabinet Manual and requires ministers to present a unified front in regard to decisions made by government. As part of this convention, ministers are able to express their views confidentially within government while supporting in public and in Parliament the decisions agreed by government. The Cabinet Manual states any minister who cannot accept government decisions “is expected to resign”. However, an exception to this rule can exist “where collective agreement is expressly set aside”.
Agreements to Differ
An exception to the normal rules regarding Cabinet collective agreement has been agreed further to the 23 June 2016 referendum on the UK’s membership of the European Union. The stated intention of this ‘agreement to differ’ was to allow for there to be a clear government position on the UK’s membership of the EU while at the same time allowing individual ministers to take different personal positions.
Previous examples of where exceptions to the principle of collective responsibility have been formally agreed are:
Civil Service Guidance
In 2016, the Government stated that, while ministers may hold their own views on the referendum, the role of the civil service should be to support the settled government position. The Cabinet Secretary and Head of the Civil Service, Sir Jeremy Heywood, issued guidance to civil servants on 23 February 2016. This guidance has been criticised by ministers opposed to the Government’s position regarding the referendum question, on the basis that it would lead to the withholding of documents by departmental civil servants from their Secretary of State.
Ministerial Collective Responsibility and Agreement to Differ: Recent Developments (163 KB , PDF)
In March 1925, the House of Lords debated a motion calling for legislation to be introduced to reform the House of Lords. Whilst composition was among the issues raised, debate focused on the loss of the House’s powers, which were curtailed by the Parliament Act 1911. The 1911 act had also called for the House to be reconstituted on a popular rather than hereditary basis. This briefing looks back at the discussion.
The government has said it wants to reform the civil service by reducing its size and improving its performance. This briefing considers the measures the government has announced, and the reaction to them from unions and commentators.
UK prime ministers may draw up a resignation honours list on their departure from office, in which they may request that the reigning monarch grant honours to any number of people. Such honours may include peerages, knighthoods and damehoods, or other awards. However, not all have chosen to draw up such a list. This briefing lists those prime ministers who have requested that peerages be conferred on their departure from office.
