Documents to download

In June 2013, the Supreme Court ruled that British servicemen deployed overseas could fall within UK jurisdiction for the purposes of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). In October 2013, the Policy Exchange think tank published a report which argued that such “legal mission creep” could “paralyse the effectiveness of the military”. This Note looks at some of the issues raised. It examines both the obligations of UK armed forces deployed overseas to local civilians and the Government’s obligations to members of the armed forces, particularly regarding the extraterritorial application of the ECHR. It also considers the prospects for change in the legal frameworks that apply to the military, including the possibility of derogation from the ECHR.


Documents to download

Related posts

  • The European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 provides the UK Supreme Court and the High Court of Justiciary in Scotland with the power to depart from retained EU case law after the end of the transition period. Draft regulations, introduced by the Government in October 2020, seek to extend this power to the Court of Appeal and other equivalent courts and tribunals. This article looks at the detail of the regulations and recent scrutiny that has taken place.

  • ‘Hate crime’ is used to describe a range of criminal behaviour that a victim or other person perceives to be motivated by hostility or prejudice towards a person’s disability, race, religion, sexual orientation or transgender identity. These aspects of a person’s identity are referred to as ‘protected characteristics’. There have been recent calls to extend the protected characteristics to cover sex and gender. This would see misogyny become a hate crime.