Documents to download

On 29 March 2017, the House of Lords is due to debate a motion tabled by Baroness Smith of Basildon, Leader of the Opposition, calling for the appointment of a Joint Committee of both Houses to consider and report by the end of October 2017 on the terms and options for votes in Parliament on the outcome of negotiations on the UK’s withdrawal from the EU, including how any such votes be taken before an agreement is considered by the European Parliament. 

Since the Supreme Court ruled that an Act of Parliament would be required to authorise ministers to trigger Article 50 and begin the process of withdrawing from the EU, Keir Starmer, the Shadow Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, has been calling for Parliament also to have “a meaningful vote at the end of the exercise”. In her Lancaster House speech on 17 January 2017, in which she set out her Brexit negotiating objectives, Theresa May confirmed that the Government would “put the final deal that is agreed between the UK and EU to a vote in both Houses of Parliament, before it comes into force”. During the Commons committee stage debate on the European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Act 2017, David Jones, Minister of State at the Department for Exiting the European Union, announced a Government undertaking to hold a parliamentary vote before a withdrawal deal was finally concluded, and a vote on the UK’s future relationship with the EU.

Several attempts (ultimately unsuccessful) were made during the passage of the Act to introduce amendments to put guarantees about a parliamentary vote on the face of the Act. At report stage, the House of Lords voted by 366 votes to 268—a majority of 98 and the largest vote on record in the House of Lords—in favour of such an amendment, but this was later overturned by the House of Commons. This briefing summarises what happened during the passage of the Act in order to provide the background context to Baroness Smith’s motion.


Documents to download

Related posts

  • Infected blood scandal: Background, impacts, interim compensation and inquiry outcomes

    Between 1970 and the early 1990s, more than 30,000 NHS patients were given blood transfusions, or treatments which used blood products, contaminated with hepatitis C or HIV. Over 3,000 people have died as a result, and thousands live with ongoing health conditions. The infected blood inquiry has reported, calling for a range of measures, including immediate compensation, public memorials, and for lessons to be learned in medicine, government and the civil service.

    Infected blood scandal: Background, impacts, interim compensation and inquiry outcomes
  • Role of the prime minister’s trade envoys

    The prime minister’s trade envoys are a network of parliamentarians appointed to engage with countries where the UK government has identified trade and investment opportunities. There were 35 trade envoys covering 58 markets as of 16 May 2024. The government has said trade envoys support the UK’s economic growth by promoting trade in key markets. However, some parliamentarians have sought clarity on aspects of the trade envoy programme.

    Role of the prime minister’s trade envoys
  • High Streets (Designation, Review and Improvement Plan) Bill: HL Bill 69 of 2023–24

    The High Streets (Designation, Review and Improvement Plan) Bill is a private member’s bill sponsored by Lord Whitby (Conservative). It would require local authorities in England to designate at least one street or network of streets in their area as a high street. Authorities would then need to prepare and publish an improvement plan for each designated high street area. The bill has passed the House of Commons and has government support.

    High Streets (Designation, Review and Improvement Plan) Bill: HL Bill 69 of 2023–24